Left and Right have been hijacked in Google and now retrieve left and right wing politics. One has to look for relative direction to find left and right. I repeated the search and there's some 'smarts' in Google that now retrieves both concepts. I knew they were watching me.
So in relation to my question about direction, Wikipedia says that: "In situations where a common frame of reference is needed, it is common to use an egocentric view." I had thought of left and right simply. I find there are many paragraphs in Wikipedia on this. I was drawn to the paragraph on Geometry of the natural environment:
"The right-hand rule is one common way to relate the three principal directions. For many years a fundamental question in physics was whether a left-hand rule would be equivalent. Many natural structures, including human bodies, follow a certain "handedness", but it was widely assumed that nature did not distinguish the two possibilities. This changed with the discovery of parity violations in particle physics. If a sample of cobalt-60 atoms is magnetized so that they spin counterclockwise around some axis, the beta radiation resulting from their nuclear decay will be preferentially directed opposite that axis. Since counter-clockwise may be defined in terms of up, forward, and right, this experiment unambiguously differentiates left from right using only natural elements: if they were reversed, or the atoms spun clockwise, the radiation would follow the spin axis instead of being opposite to it."
This means there is proof of the right-hand rule in nature. There are human cultures with no words denoting the egocentric directions. We use backwards, forwards, up, down and left, right. They might say "move a bit to the east".
Betterphoto tells me that one of my images won second place in the landscape category. Here it is - a picture from Winterthur a few years ago. No azaleas blooming so beautifully this year.
No comments:
Post a Comment