I don't think this would be considered helpful to the people arranged in it. Its title is: Hollywood's Leading Men, Arranged in a Helpful Graphic. Moreover, it weighs in at the low end of the height scale of 5 fleet tall and ends at 5'9". What is wonderful is that the graphic puts all these people on one page at one time for us to marvel at the different heights.
Here's the alternate way of considering this graphic with more celebrities and the concentration at the high end of the scale this time. What makes this so much fun is that when we are watching movies we don't know who is the tallest or who is the smallest. Hollywood does its magic with the camera and the lens.
This is one of those Google-curated retrievals - with the first few pages carefully put together to retrieve articles by paid sponsors. By page 4, the retrievals go "off-topic" and turns to the shortest celebrity marriages in Hollywood. My assumption is that these are also sponsor-paid retrievals. There are one or two articles on height related to income analysis but mostly these are jaunts through Hollywood with breezy and witty commentary that is very engaging.
The interest in this topic is substantial as there are many variations on the theme. Here's one: short actors who appear taller - e.g. Tom Cruise, Gillian Anderson, Dave Franco.
We learned about camera lenses and their impact on the appearance of width/weight. They also relate to height and articles assert that shorter actors are easier to film than tall ones.
As we enter Fall, this is the time of checking reflections in the water. This is the case at Toronto Botanical Gardens, where there is great colour next to a stream at the perfect time of day.
No comments:
Post a Comment