All I seem to care about at the Oscars is whether Anna Wintour has that much hair or was wearing a wig. At 76, it would seem impossible to have that much hair. The article talks about her rigorous daily professional styling, even twice daily.
One wonders about the veracity - the answer to the question is generated by AI, which takes the information from whoever has published it most, and likely sponsored it. The conclusion of the AI article says: “In summary, the idea that Wintour wears a wig is a persistent, unverified rumour, which professional sources cite meticulous maintenance of her natural hair.”
She as there as a sort of humorous joke to present the hair/makeup Oscar. The Devil Wears Prada 2 is out this year.
Looking at pictures of her from 1991 and 2015 shows that she hasn’t changed very much in terms of aging. Her youthful appearance has gotten surgery comments. It is observed to be regularly “refreshed.” Doesn’t that lead one to wonder about the wig idea?
And why should I focus on Anna Wintour when the outfits are so astonishingly beautiful or horrible? The commentators said one dress looked like some sort of kitchen tool. They said “Ethan Hawke wearing a vest without the accompanying jacket just looks like he should have a little dancing monkey and a music box to go with it.”
I guess it is seeing the outfits one after the other in the article that makes you wonder what most of them were thinking when they chose their outfits. This is the People article HERE. The Cosmopolitan coverage is HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment